21 May 2014
Update | Sector: Retail
Titan Company
BSE Sensex
24,298
S&P CNX
7,253
CMP: INR310
TP: INR360
Buy
New RBI circular lifts ban on gold on lease
Stock Info
Bloomberg
Equity Shares (m)
Major regulatory concerns behind; upgrade to Buy
TTAN IN
887.8
The development:
The Reserve Bank of India
(RBI),
in its circular released
52-Week Range (INR)
344/200
today, has offered relief to domestic jewellers for Metal Gold Loans (Gold
1, 6, 12 Rel. Per (%)
13/19/-8
on Lease). As per the circular,
“it has been decided to permit the nominated
M.Cap. (INR b)
275.3
banks to give Gold Metal Loans (GML) to domestic jewellery manufacturers
M.Cap. (USD b)
4.7
out of the eligible domestic import quota of 80% to the extent of GML
outstanding in their books as on March 31, 2013”.
What it means:
We interacted with the managements of Titan, TBZ and PC
Financial Snapshot (INR Million)
Jewellers. Essentially, it means the return of gold-on-lease scheme. We note
Y/E March 2014 2015E 2016E
that RBI had banned this low cost inventory funding with natural hedge
108,7 124,316 146,625
Net Sales
39
mechanism in August 2013 along with several other measures to curtail gold
10,23 12,156 14,740
EBITDA
imports — ban on import of coins, introduction of 80:20 gold import
Adj PAT
7,666 8,740 10,527
scheme. Hence, Titan and other jewellery retailers had to buy gold with
EPS (INR)
8.6
9.8
11.9
upfront payment without any provision for credit. This resulted in a strain
Gr. (%)
7.0
14.0
20.5
BV/Sh.(INR) 27.7
34.6
42.9
on balance sheet and Titan’s net cash in FY13 balance sheet turned net debt
RoE (%)
34.7
31.6
30.6
as on March 31, 2014. Also, it introduced complexity in the form of separate
RoCE (%)
36.9
31.5
31.3
hedging mechanism with associated costs. Titan had recently procured
P/E (x)
35.9
31.5
26.2
approval for international hedging as domestic contracts were not
P/BV (x)
11.2
9.0
7.2
sufficiently liquid. Post approval, its P&L had reverted to gold-on-lease
regime as regards costs (as it earned premium on currency forwards), but it
still had to pay upfront for procurement of gold. We note that the 80:20
scheme of gold imports still remains.
Shareholding pattern %
What next?
While the 80:20 scheme and regulatory uncertainty around
Mar-14 Dec-13 Mar-13
customer advances schemes persist, we believe the ban on gold on lease
Promoter 53.1
53.1
53.1
was the harshest step from Titan’s perspective. Thus, we believe lifting the
Dom. Inst
2.4
2.0
2.8
ban is a major positive as it allows Titan to manage its Jewellery business
Foreign
21.7
21.6
19.1
efficiently without increasing debt requirements. From P&L perspective,
Others
22.8
23.4
25.1
there is no major change. However, from working capital and balance sheet
perspective, it brings material relief. Also, it will preclude the need for
separate hedging through international exchanges as gold-on-lease itself is a
Stock Performance (1-year)
natural hedging tool.
Upgrade to Buy:
Our cautious stance on Titan was predicated on the harsh
regulatory regime combined with subdued discretionary demand (with
absence on gold on lease being the key concern). With the removal of ban
on gold on lease, modest sequential recovery in same store performance
and no change in expansion plans (guidance of 90,000sqft space addition in
Jewellery), we believe major concerns are behind. While we await greater
clarity from the management on the operational aspects before making
changes to our estimates, we upgrade the stock to a
Buy
from
Neutral
rating, with a revised target price of INR360 (30x FY16E EPS). Sharp
correction in gold price is a key risk.
Gautam Duggad
(Gautam.Duggad@MotilalOswal.com); +91 22 3982 5404
Manish Poddar
(Manish.Poddar@MotilalOswal.com); +91 22 3027 8029
Investors are advised to refer through disclosures made at the end of the Research Report.