20 May 2013
Capital Goods
PWGR order analysis: Key projects witness limited wins by
Chinese players; Competitive discipline bodes well
‐
Key projects like strengthening of Southern regional grid and Champa
‐
Kurukshetra HVDC transmission line connecting IPPs in Chhattisgarh have
contributed a large chunk of PWGR awards over last 5‐6 months. Interestingly,
also, a large part of the award wins in these projects have been by Indian
players with very limited participation from Chinese / Koreans.
Going forward we believe competition, particularly in PWGR tenders is likely to
be more disciplined. After significant erosion in the last few years, industry
profitability is stabilizing at lower levels. There are no signs of improvement, yet.
Green energy corridors / intra‐state transmission network / substation
automation projects are likely to contribute incrementally to order intake in
FY14/FY15. Several of these projects will necessitate technology upgradation by
Indian companies.
‐
‐
PWGR order analysis: Key projects witness limited wins by Chinese players
‐
PWGR order awards during YTDFY14 (INR11b) largely constituted orders related
to strengthening of Southern regional grid (~INR4.6b) and conductor packages
related to Champa‐Kurukshetra HVDC transmission line connecting IPPs in
Chhattisgarh (INR3.7b). Both these projects have been the key drivers of PGCIL
awards over the last 5‐6 months, with Champa‐Kurukshetra line witnessing
project awards of INR29b (44% of total awards since Dec 12) and Southern
region witnessing awards of INR13b (~35% of total awards since Jan 2013). The
asynchronous grid connection for the Southern region is targeted for
completion by Jan 2014, and thus we expect project execution to accelerate.
Also, the High Capacity Transmission Corridor (HCTC) project for connecting IPPs
in Chhattisgarh is by far one of the largest transmission projects in India, with an
estimated cost of INR288b and is being executed in phases, with 3GW capacity
in Champa – Kurukshetra line targeted to be commissioned in Twelfth Plan (by
end FY17).
‐
Interestingly, also, a large part of the project wins in both these important
projects have been largely by Indian players with very limited participation from
Chinese / Koreans. We understand that of the total project awards (excluding
insulators) of INR41b till date (from Dec 2010 onwards) for the Champa‐
Kurukshetra line, just 5‐8% of the value has been bagged by Chinese players,
while the rest of the projects have been bagged by prominent Indian players.
This indicates a meaningful improvement in the competitive environment.
‐
Going forward we believe competition, particularly in PWGR tenders is likely to
be more disciplined given i) PGWR insistence on domestic manufacturing
capacity and forfeiture of 25% of the contract value for non‐compliance ii) two
stage bidding process whereby PWGR has put in a filtering process resulting into
reduction of number of final bidders (price bids get opened depending upon
past execution credibility).
PWGR orders during FY13 stood at INR161b, down 27% YoY, which includes
HVDC transmission package worth INR25b. While PWGR ordering is likely to
plateau as large part of the 12th Plan (FY12‐17) projects have already been
tendered out; we believe that there exist upside possibilities from i) Green
Energy Corridors (investment plan INR400b), ii) Intra‐state transmission projects
1